Bryan Velazquez Essays (717 words) - , Term Papers

Bryan Velazquez Rathbone Intro to Public Admin October 24, 2017 Topic Report II The issues with the McCain law appeal is that committees are getting large sums of money to better the candidates campaign and funds for projects. It gives wealthy people the ability to donate as much many to a committee as many times as they want thus making politics revolve around money in a way and making money a big component when it comes to politics. This adds corruption into politics which has already always been in politics but this takes it to another level because of all the money that can be collected by the parties. In just about every major election the candidates take a different approach in terms of public financing and campaign funding. With the Super Pac, it has played a major influence on the latest elections in terms of the money that was raised by the parties. Super PACs have become very major keys in the campaign process over the past years and will continue to grow and play a huge role in the future elections. With the ability for people, groups, and companies to be able to donate many and publish ads in favor of their supporting candidate or against the other candidate it creates unlimited amounts of money to go towards a candidate's campaign. McCain knew that this was a problem thus he enforced a law that limited the amount of money that a campaign can receive but as of late with the law repeal Super PACs are able to play a massive role in the election. The new brand of Super PACs play into this topic because this law repeal allows for them to give as much money out to candidates as they want anonymously also so they are making politics very money centric. To put it in perspective with the law repeal these Super PACs will donate millions of dollars to both campaigns and before it was not that much. Should an election revolve around mil lions of dollars? The McCain law repeal is just another way for the wealthy to just get wealthier and it's not surprising that this is going on because of how money centric the United States is. Me personally I do not feel like this is the right thing to do, I would've rather the McCain law not be repealed because an election and campaign is more than money. It's a really big deal and too have millions of dollars be put into these candidates' campaigns is mind blowing because it shouldn't be about the money to these candidates, it should be about influencing the people of the United States and making them believe in your plan. If I was in charge of a campaign reform I would limit the amount of money that these Super PACs could donate and also make it to where the donors couldn't be anonymous. It's a problem if money is starting to take over politics like it is with just about everything else in the United States and I would change that and make politics about politics and not about the millions you can get from donations. The McCain law should've never been repealed because once it was people found lupeols in the repeal and now Super PACs are having a massive impact on the e lection. There shouldn't be a problem with people complaining about how much money they can get donated to them because it shouldn't be about that also with the millions of dollars being put into campaigns, there will be corruption in the campaign just like every other thing that has a lot of money in it. If you are limited to a certain about of donation money than it won't be unfair to one party that might not get as much money in donations by these Super PACs. Political money machines aren't good and need to be taken care of and that's why I would limit the amount of donation money a campaign can receive. Super PACs have been growing enormously and will continue to grow unless someone does something about it. Work Cited BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 1033 Rowen, Beth. Infoplease. 26 October 2017. Web Site. 26 October 2017. The Editorial Board . How